MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139413000 · doi:10.1353/toc.2011.0015

The Fight Against Climate Change: Why Is Canada Doing So Little?

2011· article· en· W2139413000 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stéphane Dion

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Tocqueville Review/La revue Tocqueville · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsHuman rightsDemocracyPolitical scienceConventionAdmirationEmpireLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Fight Against Climate Change:Why Is Canada Doing So Little? Stéphane Dion (bio) Canada is one of the most admired countries in the world. That is what several comparative studies have shown. Most recently, an international survey conducted by the Reputation Institute ranked Canada as the most admired and esteemed nation, first out of 50 countries.1 Canada is liked for its quality of life, tolerance and political stability, and for the role it plays on the world stage. Canada never aggressed another country, never had an empire, used its army only to promote peace, justice and democracy, and fought bravely in two world wars. For their leadership in building multilateral institutions, with contributions such as drafting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, creating the concept of peacekeeping forces, and advancing the Anti-Personnel Landmines Convention, Canadians have earned a strong reputation as model global citizens. But Canada is also liked for its open spaces, majestic landscapes and countless lakes, rivers, forests and mountains. President Chirac lyrically expressed the world's admiration for Canada: "an immense country, land of First Nations peoples, land of the Inuit, a land, at the same time Anglophone and Francophone, that is perfecting, in peace and tolerance, the art of living together."2 Canadians appreciate these compliments and like to think they deserve them. One of the most famous Canadians, former prime minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau, said: [End Page 21a] "Canada is known to its inhabitants and to others as a human place, a sanctuary of sanity in an increasingly troubled world. We need not search further for our identity. These traits of tolerance and courtesy and respect for our environment and for one another provide it. I suggest that a superior form of identity would be difficult to find."3 Many Canadians are thus shocked to learn that in one area, which is destined to become one of the most crucial concerns of humanity, their country is in the dock. In the fight against the crisis of human-induced climate change, Canada looks nothing like a good global citizen; it is seen as a pariah, or even a saboteur.4 Year after year, Canada is rated among the worst in the Climate Change Performance Index. In the 2011 report, it was ranked 54th of 57 countries (France was ranked 6th). Is Canada's record really that poor? I will endeavour to show that a sober and objective analysis reveals a more nuanced situation: Canada is not the worst, but it must be ranked among the bottom of the class. A class of dunces, one must add, given the chasm that exists between the countries' performance in reducing greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and the reduction levels recommended by scientists to limit global warming to less than 2°C above preindustrial temperatures.5 Beyond that climate point of no return, the effects of global warming could have very serious consequences, and Canada would not be immune, as we shall see. Put another way, Canada's record is among the lowest of the low. How can it be that a country that usually performs admirably on the international stage in many areas has such a pitiful record in the area of climate policy? Could it be because Canada itself is immune to climate change? As I will show, the opposite is true: as a Northern country, it is particularly vulnerable. Canadian leaders invoke a series of mitigating factors: the harsh climate; the vast distances between cities in a country as large as Europe but with a population of only 34 million; sustained economic and population growth; and an economy that is still very much based on industry and natural resources. They also claim that the North American economy is so tightly integrated that Canada would have a hard time acting alone, without the U.S. We will see that these claims have some validity: a transport truck hauling a heavy load from [End Page 22a] Halifax to Vancouver will obviously emit substantially more GHGs than one travelling from Lille to Marseilles. However, these factors are not enough to absolve Canada, particularly its leaders whose climate policies are far from being stringent or vigorous enough. Another...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0240.009
Scholarly communication0.0110.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0060.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Tocqueville Review/La revue TocquevilleSame topicEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207