Croyances et pratiques d’enseignants de la maternelle au sujet des habiletés métaphononologiques et de la connaissance des lettres
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude examine les croyances et les pratiques d’enseignants de la maternelle relativement à deux prédicteurs clés de la réussite de l’apprentissage de la lecture : les habiletés métaphonologiques et la connaissance des lettres. Un questionnaire, acheminé à 508 enseignants franco-québécois, a permis d’obtenir 195 réponses à une question ouverte concernant le sujet à l’étude. Traitées à l’aide d’une analyse de contenu, ces réponses révèlent que les enseignants font part de croyances et de pratiques variées. Tous les enseignants favorables à la connaissance des lettres et au développement d’habiletés métaphonologiques s’entendent sur la nécessité de procéder à un éveil de la lecture et non à un enseignement systématique. Par ailleurs, certains expriment un désir de formation professionnelle en ce domaine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".