MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139454570 · doi:10.1002/qj.49712656507

On the wave‐activity invariants and stability of the two‐layer shallow‐water semi‐geostrophic model

2000· article· en· W2139454570 on OpenAlexaff
Shuzhan Ren

Bibliographic record

VenueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeostrophic windBaroclinityStability (learning theory)PhysicsMathematical analysisInstabilityMathematicsAmplitudeMathematical physicsAnisotropyMechanicsQuantum mechanicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Although the two‐layer shallow‐water semi‐geostrophic (TLSWSG) model has been proven to be an important tool for the investigation of the dynamics of anisotropic and baroclinic flow in frontal zones, its general instability mechanism, however, has not been well understood. In light of recent work on the stability of the one‐layer SWSG model, this issue is re‐examined in this paper by extending a body of well developed theorems in the two‐layer quasi‐geostrophic (QG) model to the TLSWSG model. The generalized linearized TLSWSG model equations with respect to a parallel basic state are presented first. Conservation equations for two small‐amplitude wave‐activity invariants analogous to pseudo‐momentum and pseudo‐energy densities in QG dynamics are derived and then used to examine the stability of a parallel basic state. It is found that the TLSWSG model possesses two kinds of stability conditions: Arnold's first stability condition in the interior, plus conditions on lateral boundaries, and Arnold's second stability condition. In contrast to previous work, Ripa's ‘subsonic’ condition \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \[\left({\left({U_{G1},U_{G2} } \right)\max < \sum\nolimits_{j = 1}^2 {\left({{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 {cj}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {cj}}} \right)^{ - 1} } } \right) \] $\end{document} , where U G1 and U G2 are basic flows at two levels and C j is the phase speed of gravity waves at the jth level) is found to be unnecessary, and the underlying physical reasons, associated with the coastal Kelvin waves in the model, are given. It is also found that the phase speed of unstable normal‐mode disturbances of slow motion satisfies Howard's semi‐circle theorem. The energy—Casimir method is applied to derive small‐ and finite‐amplitude wave‐activity invariants and corresponding stability criteria for non‐parallel basic states. It turns out that the stability criteria for non‐parallel basic states include not only those for parallel basic states but also conditions associated with the anisotropy of basic flow. The nonlinear stability analyses in this work help us to understand the failure of the energy—Casimir method in deriving finite‐amplitude stability criteria in the continuously stratified semi‐geostrophic model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological SocietySame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207