Icing Wind-Tunnel Icing Test on a Contaminated Full-Scall Wing-Model at Takeoff Conditions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Icing wind-tunnel tests had been conducted in the National Research Council Canada’s 3 m x 6 m icing wind-tunnel. The airfoil tested was a full-scale 1.219m (4 ft) NACA 23012 rectangular wing. Takeoff condition was simulated by accelerating the wind speed, and aerodynamic data were obtained while pitching the airfoil at a given pitch rate profile. Aerodynamic performance of the wing was investigated with anti-icing fluids at different contamination conditions (e.g. snow, ice pellet or light freezing rain, and their combinations). These tests led to “allowances” for ice pellet conditions in place of ice pellet holdover times. Large and vigorous changes in pitching moment have been observed during takeoff stage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it