MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139476074 · doi:10.1111/0008-4085.00081

In and out of the labour market: long‐term income consequences of child‐related interruptions to women's paid work

2001· article· fr· W2139476074 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Shelley Phipps, Peter Burton, Lynn Lethbridge

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman capitalMicrodata (statistics)HumanitiesWelfare economicsEconomicsSociologyPolitical scienceLabour economicsDemographyArtCensusPopulationEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Why do Canadian mothers have lower incomes than women who have never had children? Microdata from the 1995 GSS allow examination of two hypotheses: (1) mothers have spent more time out of the labour force, thus acquiring less human capital; (2) higher levels of unpaid work lead to fatigue and/or scheduling difficulties. Measuring work history does little to account for the ‘family gap.’ The estimated child penalty is reduced by allowing for ‘human capital depreciation’ and controlling for unpaid work hours, but the two hypotheses together cannot entirely explain the gap. JEL Classification: J0, J3 Entrées et sorties: marché du travail et conséquences à long terme des interruptions dans l'expérience sur le marché du travail à cause des enfants. Ce mémoire se demande pourquoi les femmes canadiennes qui ont eu des enfants ont des revenus plus bas que ceux des femmes qui n'en ont pas eus. Les microdonnées de l'Enquête sociale générale de 1995 de Statistiques Canada permettent d'examiner deux hypothèses: (1) les mères ont passé plus de temps en dehors de la main d'oeuvre active et donc ont accumulé moins de capital humain, ou (2) des niveaux plus élevés de travail non‐rémunéré peuvent entraîner fatigue ou difficultés d'organisation du temps. Des efforts pour construire une meilleure image de l'expérience de travail des femmes ne permettent pas d'expliquer cet ‘écart familial,’ même si la possibilité qu'il y ait ‘dépréciation du capital humain’ réduit la pénalisation attachée au fait d'avoir un enfant en particulier si l'interruption dans l'expérience sur le marché du travail est suivie d'un changement d'emploi. Le nombre hebdomadaire d'heures de travail non payé est relié négativement aux revenus, et si l'on normalise pour tenir compte des heures de travail non payé cela réduit la pénalisation attachée au fait d'avoir un enfant. Cependant les deux hypothèses combinées ne suffisent pas pour expliquer l'écart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations194
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économiqueSame topicGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsFrench-language works237,207