MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139517527 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2006.489

WSN05-2: Distributed Medium Access Control in Pulse-Based Time-Hopping UWB Wireless Networks

2006· article· en· W2139517527 on OpenAlexaff
Hai Jiang, Kuang‐Hao Liu, Weihua Zhuang, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobecom · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltra-Wideband Communications Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkWirelessTime-hoppingFrame (networking)Ultra-widebandDistributed algorithmTransmission (telecommunications)Wireless sensor networkWireless networkAccess controlCommunication sourceDistributed computingPulse (music)TelecommunicationsPulse-amplitude modulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates distributed medium access control (MAC) to achieve rate guarantee in pulse-based time- hopping ultra-wideband (UWB) wireless networks, where the inherent spread spectrum supports simultaneous transmissions. In specific, we propose a transmission frame structure for the distributed MAC tailoring to the UWB characteristics, and develop a novel control message exchange procedure. Furthermore, we propose an effective distributed resource allocation algorithm to achieve high efficiency. The proposed distributed MAC can solve thenear-sender-blockingproblemand alleviate the negative effect of long acquisition time in UWB transmissions. Extensive simulations demonstrate the superior performance of the distributed MAC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobecomSame topicUltra-Wideband Communications TechnologyFrench-language works237,207