MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139521967 · doi:10.7202/008491ar

Effets de la réduction de doses de formulations d’insecticides et de fongicides sur l’insecte auxiliaire non ciblé Episyrphus balteatus [Diptera : Syrphidae]

2004· article· fr· W2139521967 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pierre Colignon, Éric Haubruge, Charles Gaspar, Frédéric Francis

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytoprotection · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect and Pesticide Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyForestryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’objectif de cette étude consistait à déterminer les effets létaux et sublétaux de quatre formulations utilisées communément en cultures maraîchères de plein champ sur l’auxiliaire Episyrphus balteatus [Diptera : Syrphidae]. La toxicité aiguë et les effets chroniques de ces produits à la dose recommandée et à doses réduites furent évalués en conditions de laboratoire en plaçant les insectes directement en contact avec des organes végétaux imprégnés de pesticide. Les insecticides Karate® et Pirimor® se sont révélés très toxiques, même à faible dose. Une certaine sélectivité n’apparaît qu’à 2,5 % de la dose recommandée. Les fongicides Ronilan®et Quintalic®qui n’ont pas montré une toxicité aiguë aussi drastique ont néanmoins engendré des effets néfastes à plus long terme sur les paramètres de développement et de reproduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytoprotectionSame topicInsect and Pesticide ResearchFrench-language works237,207