Assessing the Impact of Parental Drug Use, Family Structure, and Environmental Conditions on Adolescents' Self-Reported Drug Use, Serious Delinquency, and Deviant Behaviors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Empirical studies have demonstrated that youths reared in homes with parental drug use have a high risk of exhibiting maladaptive social behaviors encompassing delinquency, deviance, and criminality. Family transitions, such as changes in the configuration of one’s family structure (i.e. single parent households due to divorce or separation) have shown to have a negative impact on the behavioral development of adolescents. Despite the axiomatic role of the home environment in engendering aberrant behaviors, key findings have also linked criminogenic forces at the neighborhood level to the outcomes of adolescents’ drug use, serious delinquency, and deviance. The current study explored the impact of parental drug use, family structure, and environmental conditions on youths’ self-reported drug use, serious delinquency, and deviance. The results of the study demonstrated that the outcome behaviors are impacted by both neighborhood and home conditions. However, the type of predictor variable mattered for the type of outcome behavior reported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".