Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p class="zhengwen"><span lang="EN-GB">New cloud-based services are being developed constantly in order to meet the need for faster, reliable and scalable methods for knowledge discovery. The major benefit of the cloud-based services is the efficient execution of heavy computation algorithms in the cloud simply by using Big Data storage and processing platforms. Therefore, we have proposed a model that provides data mining techniques as cloud-based services that are available to users on their demand. The widely known data mining algorithms have been implemented as Map/Reduce jobs that are been executed as services in cloud architecture. The user simply chooses or uploads the dataset to the cloud, makes appropriate settings for the data mining algorithm, executes the job request to be processed and receives the results. The major benefit of this model of cloud-based services is the efficient execution of heavy computation data mining algorithm in the cloud simply by using the Ankus - Open Source Big Data Mining Tool and StarfishHadoop Log Analyzer. The expected outcome of this research is to offer the integration of the cloud-based services for data mining analysis in order to provide researchers with reliable collaborative data mining analysis model.<strong></strong></span></p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".