MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139609395 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2008.4564602

A fuzzy decision making strategy for vertical handoffs

2008· article· en· W2139609395 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHandoverComputer scienceRSSComputer networkVertical handoverContext (archaeology)Fuzzy logicWireless networkWirelessVariety (cybernetics)Selection (genetic algorithm)Terminal (telecommunication)Mobility managementOperations researchHeterogeneous networkTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main concern of the next generation of mobile networks is the integration of heterogeneous wireless technologies around an IP backbone. However this integration invokes many challenges such as mobility management and handoff decision making. Various approaches have been proposed to deal with handover decision problem, yet handoff initiation and network destination selection remain critical issues which are widely based on the traditional RSS measurements. In this paper, we propose a new fuzzy decision making approach that considers a variety of context parameters to trigger handoffs and choose an optimal network destination with respect to mobile terminal requirements and nearby network capabilities. The obtained results show that the proposed decision making approach maximize user preferences compared to the RSS based decision methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it