MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139620487 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1999.804899

Ultrasonic distance measurement and data fusion to aid estimators with initialisation mechanisms

2003· article· en· W2139620487 on OpenAlex
A. Lucas de Couville, P. Sicard, Yves Dubé

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFlow Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSensor fusionKalman filterComputer scienceObservational errorFusionUltrasonic sensorAlgorithmComputer visionSIGNAL (programming language)Filter (signal processing)EstimatorMeasurement uncertaintyArtificial intelligenceDistance measurementMathematicsAcousticsStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a solution for two problems for the precise perception of the environment, distance measurement using an ultrasonic transducer and data fusion for positioning a detected object. The distance measurement algorithm is based on the measurement of time of flight and is determined by intercorrelation between a function of the signal emitted and the signal received. The data fusion is employed for estimating the tangent from the point measured to the object detected. The fusion is effected by the recursive least squares identification algorithms and is based on a Kalman filter, with initialisation of the covariance matrix conditioned by an estimation of a large variation error and with immunity to repetitive initialisation. The distance measurement is validated by experiment and the data fusion by simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFlow Measurement and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207