Sedimentology, ichnology, ecology and anthropogenic modification of muddy tidal flats in a cold-temperate environment: Chignecto Bay, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In Chignecto Bay, upper Bay of Fundy, Canada, the muddy tidal flats exhibit distinctive sedimentological and ichnological characteristics indicative of winter conditions and the development of ice. From late spring to autumn (May–October: mean temperature +13.6 °C), the mud flats sustain a high infaunal biomass and sediment deposition is dominated by tidal processes. Neap–spring tidal rhythmites, fluid-mud deposition and high levels of bioturbation are all characteristic of summer deposits. During the winter, temperatures remain below zero (December–March: mean temperature −6.3 °C), and ice forms in the bay and periodically on the mud flats. Ice rafts and blocks are common on the tidal-flat surface, and these blocks deform the muddy sediment, cut deep scours and deposit allochthonous sediment (including gravel) across the flats. Intermittent storms in the autumn and winter also contribute to sediment scouring and erosion. Annual die-offs of infauna are reflected by reduced bioturbation in winter deposits. Each spring, renewed larval recruitment and opportunistic colonization results in increasing levels of bioturbation, and the trace suite is dominated by a low-diversity assemblage of diminutive, vertical burrows. The summer–winter cyclicity in infaunal colonization manifests, ichnologically, as a distinctive bioturbated–non-bioturbated bedset character. Infaunal populations in Chignecto Bay peak in the late spring and in the late summer–early autumn. Both population peaks are exploited by vertebrates, including migrating Atlantic sturgeon (late spring) and migratory shorebirds (late summer–early autumn). In particular, the upper Bay of Fundy, including Chignecto Bay, is a staging ground for approximately 42–74% of the world’s Semipalmated sandpipers ( Calidris pusilla ) on their annual migration from the Arctic to South America. Fortunately, anthropogenic modification of Chignecto Bay, and its associated bays and rivers (e.g. construction and dismantling of a causeway over the Petitcodiac River), has not had a significant effect, to date, on the mud-flat habitat or the infaunal biomass.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".