MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139635632 · doi:10.1029/2009ja014106

Start‐to‐end global imaging of a sunward propagating, SAPS‐associated giant undulation event

2010· article· en· W2139635632 on OpenAlexaff
M. G. Henderson, E. Donovan, J. C. Foster, I. R. Mann, T. J. Immel, S. B. Mende, J. B. Sigwarth

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSubstormPlasma sheetGeophysicsGeologyPlasmaspherePhysicsInstabilityMagnetosphereElectron precipitationIonosphereAmplitudePlasmaOpticsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present high time resolution global imaging of a sunward propagating giant undulation event from start to finish. The event occurred on 24 November 2001 during a very disturbed storm interval. The giant undulations began to develop at around 1345 UTC and persisted for approximately 2 h. The sunward propagation speed was on the order of 0.6 km/s (relative to magnetic latitude–magnetic local time coordinate system). The undulations had a wavelength of ∼718 km and amplitudes of ∼890 km and produced ULF pulsations on the ground with a period of ∼1108 s. We show (1) that the undulations were associated with subauroral polarization stream (SAPS) flows that were caused by the proton plasma sheet penetrating substantially farther earthward than the electron plasma sheet on the duskside and (2) that they may have been related to the arrival on the duskside of a substorm‐associated westward traveling surge‐like structure. The observations appear to be consistent with the development of a shear flow and/or ballooning type of instability at the plasmapause driven by intense SAPS‐associated shear flows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207