MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2139659621 · doi:10.1139/w09-009

Subinhibitory concentrations of fluconazole increase the intracellular sodium content in both fluconazole-resistant and -sensitive <i>Candida albicans</i> strains

2009· article· en· W2139659621 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anna Kolecka, Yannick Krauke, Helena Bujdáková, Hana Sychrová

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsFluconazoleCandida albicansMicrobiologyIntracellularChemistryBiologySodiumAntifungalBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fluconazole-sensitive (SC 5314) and -resistant (clinical isolate 1173) Candida albicans strains were compared in terms of their osmotolerance and tolerance to toxic sodium cations. The two strains did not differ in their tolerance to high osmotic pressure in general but exhibited distinct sensitivities to sodium cations. Although the fluconazole-resistant 1173 strain contained, under all conditions tested, significantly lower intracellular amounts of Na+, it was much more sodium sensitive than the SC 5314 strain. The addition of subinhibitory concentrations of fluconazole to media supplemented with NaCl significantly influenced the growth of both strains and resulted in substantially elevated intracellular sodium concentrations compared with growth in medium containing NaCl but no fluconazole.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Microbiology→Same topicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility→French-language works237,207→