MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139660129 · doi:10.1109/isads.2007.29

Developing Autonomic Feedback Control for Heterogeneous Systems Using Cascaded Controllers

2007· article· en· W2139660129 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceControl (management)Reference modelPoint (geometry)Feedback controlControl systemValue (mathematics)Control theory (sociology)Work (physics)Control engineeringArtificial intelligenceMachine learningEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The motivation of the work is based on the static use of reference point values in dynamic feedback control systems that are based on control theoretic techniques. Reference point values are threshold values that values of attributes characterizing system behavior can be compared to. The result of the comparison is used to adjust the tuning parameter of the system being controlled. If the entity being controlled is a server then the best choice for the reference value may depend on many factors such as the required processing times, the machine speed that the server is executing on, etc. This paper illustrates an approach to automatically change the reference value for different server hardware. Comparisons are made between the approach proposed in this paper and other dynamic feedback control approaches. Results show that the proposed approach outperforms the other dynamic feedback control approaches

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207