MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139685793 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2004.825416

A Single-Source Surface Integral Formulation for Eddy-Current Problems

2004· article· en· W2139685793 on OpenAlexaff
I.R. Ciric, Radu Curiac

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntegral equationEddy currentConductorSurface (topology)Electric-field integral equationComputationElectrical conductorMathematical analysisSurface integralBoundary (topology)Applied mathematicsMathematicsPhysicsGeometryAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel integral equation satisfied by a single unknown surface current density is formulated for the two-dimensional analysis of the quasi-stationary field in systems of parallel conductors. This is an alternative to the coupled boundary integral equations formulated in terms of two unknowns, the magnetic vector potential and its normal derivative over each conductor surface. The accuracy of the results computed by the proposed solution method is demonstrated by comparison with results from exact analytical solutions. In order to demonstrate the increased efficiency of the proposed method, various test results are also compared with those obtained from the existent boundary integral equations. Significant reductions in the computation time have been achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MagneticsSame topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207