MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139725259 · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2009.5346183

Data acquisition and modeling of 3D deformable objects using neural networks

2009· article· en· W2139725259 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceA priori and a posterioriPoint cloudArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkRepresentation (politics)Computer visionObject (grammar)Joint (building)Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognitionFeed forwardRange (aeronautics)Feedforward neural networkData modelingControl engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of the work presented in this paper is to develop a novel scheme for the measurement and representation of deformable objects without a priori knowledge on their shape or material. The proposed solution advantageously combines a neural gas network and feedforward neural network architectures to achieve diversified tasks as required for data collection on one side and the modeling of elastic characteristics on the other side. Data is collected for different objects using a joint sensing strategy that combines tactile probing and range imaging. The innovative object models, built as multi-resolution point-clouds associated with ¿tactile patches¿, present certain advantages over classical deformable 3D object models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it