MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139740247 · doi:10.1017/s0008423906309997

Au sein de la Maison-Blanche. La formulation de la politique étrangère des Etats-Unis.

2006· article· fr· W2139740247 on OpenAlexaffabout
Olivier Legros

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Political Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Peace and Security Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au sein de la Maison-Blanche. La formulation de la politique étrangère des Etats-Unis. , David, Charles-Philippe, Québec : Presses de l'Université Laval, deuxième édition, 2004, 737 p. Charles-Philippe David est un chercheur francophone bien connu dans les milieux académiques de la discipline des relations internationales. Il a publié un bon nombre d'ouvrages et d'articles sur la sécurité internationale, les études stratégiques et diplomatiques et la politique américaine. Ses travaux de langue française sont particulièrement importants et bienvenus chez les chercheurs et les étudiants francophones s'intéressant à une discipline où la langue de Shakespeare est largement prédominante. David récidive donc avec la 2 e édition de ce volumineux livre de quelque 700 pages, avec l'addition d'un chapitre sur la présidence de George W. Bush et d'une étude de cas sur l'invasion de l'Irak. L'objectif général de l'auteur est d'analyser de l'intérieur la formulation de la politique extérieure des États-Unis, de Truman à Bush, le fils. L'angle d'analyse de Charles-Philippe David est particulier, dans le sens où il défie les théories des relations internationales systémiques, sociétales ou rationnelles auxquelles les étudiants sont souvent invités à s'intéresser.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.010
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Political ScienceSame topicGlobal Peace and Security DynamicsFrench-language works237,207