MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139753542 · doi:10.5897/jmer12.047

Aeration of volatile organic compounds using gas dispersion impellers

2012· article· en· W2139753542 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMechanical Engineering Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMembrane Separation Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerationAir strippingBaffleEnvironmental scienceWastewaterPollutantImpellerEnvironmental engineeringWaste managementMass transfer coefficientSewage treatmentDispersion (optics)Mass transferPulp and paper industryChemistryChromatographyChemical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A number of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are found in the wastewater and some of these VOCs are very harmful to human health as well as environment. Although there are several methods which are being used for the removal of VOCs, air stripping process is the low energy usage, low preventive and maintenance cost and high efficiency process which can stripe VOCs from wastewater. The present study consists of aeration system for the removal of VOCs. Aeration of VOC is based on the mass transfer rate of VOCs from the liquid to gaseous phase. Principle of air stripping involves the mass transfer of volatile organic contaminant from water to air. The system can be easily upgraded to strip greater amount of VOCs with relatively small increase in capital cost. Aeration tanks strip volatile compounds by bubbling air into tank through which contaminated water flows. The present study shows aeration of a VOC by using advanced designed gas dispersing radial impeller that is, Rushton, CD-6 and BT-6 and the factors which affect the design of an aeration tank baffles and the impeller used for best possible result. This study also shows the removal of VOCs at different height of submergence. It also shows the effect of air supply on the removal of VOCs at different operating condition. A comparison of the result from experiment shows the emission rate of VOCs during aeration and is a function of mass transfer coefficient of air; it increases with increase of submergence of height, by supply of air, and increase in impeller speed. Best aeration result can be obtained at the 2/3rd height of the submergence of the total depth of water for impeller used. The study also shows that the gas dispersion BT-6 impeller has larger removal efficiency (up to 96%, with air supply at 4 h run) compare to Rushton and CD-6 impeller.   Key words: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), aeration, mass transfer coefficient, stripping, gas dispersion impellers, Rushton, CD-6, BT-6, gas liquid mass transfer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it