MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139757566 · doi:10.1017/s0963548302005254

Random Regular Graphs of Non-Constant Degree: Independence and Chromatic Number

2002· article· en· W2139757566 on OpenAlexaff
Colin Cooper, Alan Frieze, Bruce Reed, Oliver Riordan

Bibliographic record

VenueCombinatorics Probability Computing · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicLimits and Structures in Graph Theory
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsChromatic scaleVertex (graph theory)Constant (computer programming)Independence numberRandom graphDegree (music)Discrete mathematicsGraphRandom regular graphChordal graph1-planar graphPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let r = r(n) → ∞ with 3 [les ] r [les ] n1−η for an arbitrarily small constant η > 0, and let Gr denote a graph chosen uniformly at random from the set of r-regular graphs with vertex set {1, 2, …, n}. We prove that, with probability tending to 1 as n → ∞, Gr has the following properties: the independence number of Gr is asymptotically 2n log r/r and the chromatic number of Gr is asymptotically r/2nlogr.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCombinatorics Probability ComputingSame topicLimits and Structures in Graph TheoryFrench-language works237,207