MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139781224 · doi:10.5339/qfarf.2012.csps14

Minimum-selection maximum ratio transmission schemes in underlay cognitive radio systems

2012· article· en· W2139781224 on OpenAlexaff
Zied Bouida, Ali Ghrayeb, Khalid Qaraqe

Bibliographic record

VenueQatar Foundation Annual Research Forum Volume 2012 Issue 1 · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTransmission (telecommunications)Cognitive radioSpectral efficiencyMaximal-ratio combiningBandwidth (computing)Interference (communication)Electronic engineeringAlgorithmTelecommunicationsWirelessChannel (broadcasting)Decoding methodsFadingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under the scenario of an underlay cognitive radio network, we introduce the concept of minimum-selection maximum ratio transmission (MS-MRT). Inspired by the mode of operation of the minimum-selection generalized selection combining (MS-GSC) technique, the main idea behind MS-MRT is to present an adaptive variation of the existing maximum ratio transmission (MRT) technique. While in the MRT scheme, all the transmit antennas are used for transmission, and only a subset of antennas verifying the interference constraint to the primary receiver in MS-MRT are adaptively selected and optimally beamformed in order to meet a given modulation requirement. The main goal of these schemes is to maximize the capacity of the secondary link while satisfying the bit error rate (BER) requirement and a peak interference constraint to the primary link. The performance of the proposed schemes is analyzed in terms of the average spectral efficiency, the average number of antennas used for transmission, the average delay, and the average BER performance. These results are then compared to the existing bandwidth efficient and switching efficient schemes (BES and SES, respectively). The obtained analytical results are then verified with selected numerical examples obtained via Monte-Carlo simulations. We demonstrate through these examples that the proposed schemes improve the spectral and the delay performance of the SES and BES schemes and fit better to delay sensitive applications. The proposed schemes also offer better processing-power consumption than the MRT schemes since a minimum number of antennas is used for communication in the MS-MRT schemes. The MS-MRT techniques represent power and spectral efficient schemes that can be extended to more practical scenarios. As an example, these schemes can be studied in the context of Long term Evolution (LTE) Networks where adaptive modulation, beamforming, and interference management are of the major enabling Techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQatar Foundation Annual Research Forum Volume 2012 Issue 1Same topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207