Ruptured aneurysm at the choroidal branch of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery: a case report, review of the literature and proposed pathogenesis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aneurysms rarely occur at the choroidal branch of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) and their pathogenesis is not well understood. We report such a case and review the literature. A 69-year-old female was admitted for a sudden onset of severe headache with nausea and vomiting. Soon after arrival, she became less responsive. CT of the head revealed an intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) predominantly in the fourth and third ventricles without subarachnoid hemorrhage and associated with hydrocephalus. Cerebral angiography demonstrated an aneurysm at the choroidal branch of the PICA. The aneurysm was resected through a bilateral suboccipital craniotomy. The patient made a remarkable recovery. The literature describes five other cases of aneurysms arising from a choroidal branch of the PICA. Hypertension was a common finding in this population. In summary, aneurysms arising from a choroidal branch of the PICA are rare. Hypertensive vessel damage might be a major factor in their pathogenesis. We propose that the rupture of a hypertensive aneurysm might account for some isolated spontaneous IVH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it