Velocity Estimation by Using Position and Acceleration Sensors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Knowledge of velocity is crucial to certain industrial applications involving high-bandwidth modeling and control. In conventional approaches, the velocities obtained from encoders or tachometers are quite noisy, and low-pass filters are usually engaged to generate usable velocity signals. The low-pass filter, however, causes significant phase lag that can severely affect both modeling and control accuracy in the mid- and high-frequency ranges. In this paper, two approaches using a combination of an encoder and an imperfect accelerometer are proposed to estimate velocities with high bandwidth. The two approaches, namely the two-channel approach and the observer-based approach, estimate velocities by applying proper frequency weightings to the encoder and accelerometer signals. The encoder mainly contributes to the low-frequency components of velocity estimation, and the accelerometer mainly contributes to the high-frequency components of velocity estimation. An adaptive mechanism for estimating the accelerometer gain is also presented. The effectiveness of the two velocity estimation approaches is verified experimentally with respect to a one-degree-of-freedom robot performing both rigid contact modeling and control. Extension to 3-D applications is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".