MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139852328 · doi:10.2113/49.3.429

Basement reactivation in the Alberta Basin: Observational constraints and mechanical rationale

2001· article· en· W2139852328 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Gerald M. Ross

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationIconGeologyGeological surveyLibrary scienceBasementStructural basinArchaeologyHistoryPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Other| September 01, 2001 Basement reactivation in the Alberta Basin: Observational constraints and mechanical rationale G.M. Ross; G.M. Ross Natural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada (Calgary), 3303 - 33rd St. NW, Calgary, AB, T2L 2A7 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar D.W. Eaton D.W. Eaton Department of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5B7 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information G.M. Ross Natural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada (Calgary), 3303 - 33rd St. NW, Calgary, AB, T2L 2A7 D.W. Eaton Department of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5B7 Publisher: Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Received: 16 Apr 2001 Accepted: 18 Apr 2001 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 2368-0261 Print ISSN: 0007-4802 © The Society of Canadian Petroleum Geologists Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2001) 49 (3): 429–433. https://doi.org/10.2113/49.3.429 Article history Received: 16 Apr 2001 Accepted: 18 Apr 2001 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation G.M. Ross, D.W. Eaton; Basement reactivation in the Alberta Basin: Observational constraints and mechanical rationale. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 2001;; 49 (3): 429–433. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/49.3.429 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Search Advanced Search We wish to thank S. Parker Gay, Jr. for his comments on our paper. The strong reaction that our work has elicited illustrates the critical importance of this topic for understanding the role of basement structure in basin evolution, as well as the range of opinions that exist in the exploration community. Our approach has been to develop and apply a mechanical rationale for understanding basement control of sedimentation and diagenetic patterns in the Alberta Basin. A unique opportunity presents itself because, for the first time, through the Lithoprobe program we have modem, public-domain, seismic images of structure in the... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum GeologySame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207