Chromatin immunoprecipitation identifies genes under direct VraSR regulation in <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transcriptional profiling of Staphylococcus aureus treated with cell wall-active antibiotics identified the 2-component system, VraSR, as one of the key players in response to antibiotic stress. Although it has been shown that a number of genes are regulated by the VraSR system, it has not been shown which genes are under direct VraSR regulation and which genes are not. In this study, chromatin immunoprecipitation techniques were used to identify the genes which are regulated by the direct interaction of VraR with their promoter regions. The results showed for the first time, that the VraSR mediated regulation of cell wall biosynthesis-associated genes, pbp2, murZ, and sgtB are facilitated by the direct binding of VraR to their respective promoters. Conversely, fmtA, indicated previously to be under VraSR regulation did not exhibit direct regulation by the binding of VraR to its promoter. The VraSR system plays a very important role in antibiotic resistance against cell wall-active antibiotics, and hence, it is essential to understand its complete regulatory mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".