Boundary layer theory modified for analysis of wave flow on the surface of a viscous liquid finite-thickness layer resting on a hard bottom
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The theory of a boundary layer that is adjacent to the surface of an indefinitely deep viscous liquid and caused by its periodic motion is modified for analysis of finite-amplitude flow motion on the charged surface of a viscous conductive finite-thickness liquid layer resting on a hard bottom (the thickness of the layer is comparable to the wavelength). With the aim of adequately describing the viscous liquid flow, two boundary layers are considered: one at the free surface and the other at the hard bottom. The thicknesses of the boundary layers are estimated for which the difference between an exact solution and a solution to a model problem (stated in terms of the modified theory) may be set with a desired accuracy in the low-viscosity approximation. It is shown that the presence of the lower (bottom) boundary layer should be taken into account (with a relative computational error no more than 0.001) only if the thickness of the viscous layer does not exceed two wavelengths. For thicker layers, the bottom flow may be considered potential. In shallow liquids (with a thickness of two tenths of the wavelength or less), the upper (near-surface) and bottom layers overlap and the eddy flow entirely occupies the liquid volume. As the surface charge approaches a value that is critical for the onset of instability against the electric field negative pressure, the thicknesses of both layers sharply grow.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".