MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139915740 · doi:10.1109/cdc.1991.261734

An improved algorithm for estimating paper machine moisture profiles using scanned data

2002· article· en· W2139915740 on OpenAlexaff
Guy A. Dumont, M.S. Davies, Claës Lindeborg, Fariborz Talebzade Ordubadi, Ye Fu, K. Kristinsson, I.M. Jonsson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSensor Technology and Measurement Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmIdentifierComputer scienceKalman filterProcess (computing)Noise (video)Least-squares function approximationArtificial intelligenceMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An improved estimation algorithm for use in processing data generated online by a scanning sensor is described. The algorithm is to be used as part of a paper machine control system to maintain the moisture content of the sheet at a target value. The algorithm rapidly estimates, in the presence of noise, cross and machine direction moisture profiles. The basic algorithm consists of a modified least-squares parameter identifier for estimating cross direction profile deviations and a Kalman filter for estimating machine direction disturbances. Simulation results showing the effectiveness of the algorithm in estimating known profiles are given. Results of the offline application of the algorithm to industrial data are also given. Online tests have been performed to demonstrate the improvements in accuracy and speed of detection of process upsets.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSensor Technology and Measurement SystemsFrench-language works237,207