MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139936204 · doi:10.1024/0300-9831.73.1.15

Rapid HPLC Method for Measurement of Vitamin D<sub>3</sub> and 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub> in Blood Plasma

2003· article· en· W2139936204 on OpenAlexafffund
A. A. Olkowski, Gilberto Aranda Osorio, James McKinnon

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsReproducibilityChromatographyHigh-performance liquid chromatographyAnalyteMetaboliteExtraction (chemistry)ChemistryVitaminBlood plasmaCholecalciferolQuantitative analysis (chemistry)Whole bloodVitamin D and neurologyMedicineBiochemistrySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present work describes a novel, simplified high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for evaluation of vitamin D3 and its 25-hydroxy metabolite in blood plasma. The retrieval of the analytes from the blood plasma matrix is based on a single-step extraction using acetonitrile. The method is specific, sensitive, and ensures good reproducibility. The recovery of the analytes, precision, and reproducibility obtained using the present approach gave results comparable to or better than more complex, laborious, and time-consuming procedures. This method is suitable for evaluation of the host's vitamin D physiological status, as well as for rapid analysis of blood plasma samples in suspected cholecalciferol toxicity. With a significantly shortened time of analysis (10 minutes), the present method allows the possibility for processing of a large number of samples rapidly, efficiently, and at a low cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition ResearchSame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207