MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139941555 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2007.908

Resource Allocation for Conversational, Streaming, and Interactive Services in Cellular/WLAN Interworking

2007· article· en· W2139941555 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkComputer scienceHandoverExploitSession (web analytics)Resource allocationService (business)ProvisioningIT service continuityCellular networkScheme (mathematics)WirelessWireless networkCall Admission ControlQuality of serviceTelecommunicationsComputer securityWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multi-service support is an important motivation for interworking between the cellular network and wireless local area networks (WLANs). The complementary strengths of the two networks can be effectively combined to enhance service provisioning. In this paper, we investigate how to properly allocate the overall resources in the integrated network to conversational, streaming, and interactive services. The proposed strategy exploits the essential traffic characteristics such as bursty video streams and elastic data traffic. The system performance is significantly improved over the WLAN-first scheme by applying admission control with service-differentiated session assignment and session migration via vertical handoff.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it