MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139961280 · doi:10.1109/tit.2007.901177

Single-Symbol ML Decodable Distributed STBCs for Cooperative Networks

2007· article· en· W2139961280 on OpenAlexaff
Zhihang Yi, Il‐Min Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUpper and lower boundsMonomialMathematicsBlock codeDiagonalCovarianceCombinatoricsBlock (permutation group theory)Diagonal matrixDiscrete mathematicsSymbol (formal)AlgorithmDecoding methodsComputer scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this correspondence, the distributed orthogonal space-time block codes (DOSTBCs), which achieve the single-symbol maximum likelihood (ML) decodability and full diversity order, are first considered. However, systematic construction of the DOSTBCs is very hard, since the noise covariance matrix is not diagonal in general. Thus, some special DOSTBCs, which have diagonal noise covariance matrices at the destination terminal, are investigated. These codes are referred to as the row-monomial DOSTBCs. An upper bound of the data-rate of the row-monomial DOSTBC is derived and it is approximately twice higher than that of the repetition-based cooperative strategy. Furthermore, systematic construction methods of the row-monomial DOSTBCs achieving the upper bound of the data-rate are developed when the number of relays and/or the number of information-bearing symbols are even.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Information TheorySame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207