MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Six-port digital receivers (SPDRs): A new design approach

2000· article· en· W2139988717 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscriminatorDemodulationElectronic engineeringPhase-shift keyingElectronic circuitMonolithic microwave integrated circuitMicrowaveComputer scienceRadio frequencyElectrical engineeringEngineeringDetectorCMOSTelecommunicationsBit error rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new SPDR design approach is proposed. The receiver contains an RF discriminator, power detectors, a signal level comparison circuit, a decoder, and data and carrier recovery circuits for BPSK and QPSK signals. The new receiver operates solely on analog circuits, and the proposed design is validated with circuit and system simulations of an RF discriminator and a Costas-type phase-locked loop, demonstration of a demodulator at 2.4 GHz, and MMIC fabrication of an RF discriminator at 15 GHz. The new design approach offers interesting possibilities to achieve SPDR-on-a-chip. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 25: 356–360, 2000.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it