Obstacles and Challenges in Management of Social Cooperation in Administration of Zone 3, Isfahan, Iran
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present research aims to recognizing the effective factors on reduction of social cooperation with the purpose of attracting social cooperation in directing city zones (zone 3, Isfahan, Iran). The methodology is based on documental and survey methods. The statistical sample of this research contains over 18 year-old people who live in zone number 3 inIsfahan, from whom 385 individuals were chosen as the sampleofthis research using Cochran method. To collect data, a researcher made questionnaire (analysis of effective factors on social cooperation in directing city zones) was utilized. The findings show that the effectiveness rate of cooperation, trust on executives and organizations, training, residency status, education status, stimulus, and the role of the person in the family are preventing factors of social cooperation in directing the city zones (zone number 3 inIsfahan). Therefore, if the responsible authorities are fond of removing the obstacles of social cooperation in directing the city zones (zone number 3 in Isfahan), they should think of the above mentioned obstacles and decide on these items for their long term goals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".