MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140056771 · doi:10.1109/icmew.2012.15

SVD Filter Based Multiscale Approach for Image Quality Assessment

2012· article· en· W2140056771 on OpenAlexafffund
Ashirbani Saha, Gaurav Bhatnagar, Q. M. Jonathan Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMetric (unit)Singular value decompositionPyramid (geometry)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceImage qualitySimilarity (geometry)Filter (signal processing)Human visual system modelPattern recognition (psychology)Image processingImage (mathematics)Variance (accounting)Data miningComputer visionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automatic assessment of image quality in accordance with the human visual system (HVS) finds application in various image processing tasks. In the last decade, a substantial proliferation in image quality assessment (IQA) based on structural similarity has been observed. The structural information estimation includes statistical values (mean, variance, and correlation), gradient information, Harris response and singular values. In this paper, we propose a multiscale image quality metric which exploits the properties of Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to get approximate pyramid structure for its use in IQA. The proposed multiscale metric has been extensively evaluated in the LIVE database and CSIQ database. Experiments have been carried out on the effective number of scales used as well as on the effective proportion of different scales required for the metric. The proposed metric achieves competitive performance with the structural similarity based state-of-the-art methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207