MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140068869 · doi:10.1287/ited.5.3.55

The Free ISP Model and Spinway, Inc.

2005· article· en· W2140068869 on OpenAlexaff
É. Rolland, Daria Fedotova, Raymond A. Patterson

Bibliographic record

VenueINFORMS Transactions on Education · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Governance and Law
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since 1996, several major free ISP services have been founded in the US and elsewhere, including Spinway, Inc. Spinway's services were offered primarily through, and under the name of, large consumer companies such as Yahoo!, KMart, Costco, Spiegel, Barnes & Noble, Ace Hardware, and NBC among others. By early 2001, the free ISP market had been reduced severely, primarily due to the lack of revenues associated with such “free” services. Spinway, founded in 1998, was a major, and perhaps the largest, free ISP in the US with over 6 million customers at its peak. Spinway folded in December of 2000, and the remains of their services were taken over by Kmart's BlueLight.com. In November of 2002, BlueLight.com was sold to United Online and the ISP services available through BlueLight.com are no longer free. This teaching case discusses the viability of free digital infrastructures, such as Internet Service Providers (ISP). We seek to highlight and learn from the general issues experienced at Spinway and at other ISPs and Internet companies of the time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0110.009
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0640.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINFORMS Transactions on EducationSame topicCorporate Governance and LawFrench-language works237,207