Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pollen records are used to reconstruct vegetation in the continental Northwest Territories at 6 ka (6000 14C yr BP). Picea glauca, P mariana, Larix laricina, Populus tremuloides, P. balsamifera, Alnus crispa and A. incana were present throughout their modern ranges in the Boreal and Subarctic Forest Zones by 6000 BP. Pinus banksiana, however, had not yet reached its present northern limits. Population densities of the dominant trees, Picea glauca and Picea mariana, were close to, or as high as, present. In the Mackenzie Delta region the range limit of Picea glauca was approximately 25 km north of its modern location just prior to 6000 BP. In contrast, the northern limits of the forest in central Canada were similar to present. The tundra vegetation close to the edge of the forest was similar to modern Low Arctic Tundra. Development of extensive Sphagnum peatlands had begun in the forested areas and the adjacent Low Arctic Tundra. Palaeoecological information regarding vegetation at 6000 BP remains lacking for the northeastern half of the study area. Therefore, the nature of the vegetation in much of the area now occupied by Low Arctic and Middle Arctic Tundra remains unknown. Important vegetation changes that occurred following 6 ka include : (1) the advance of Pinus banksiana to its present northern range limits, (2) the retreat of the northern range limits of Picea glauca in the Mackenzie Delta region between 6000 and 3500 BP and (3) the rapid and marked increase in the population density of Picea mariana in the treeline zone of the central Northwest Territories at 5000 BP followed by a decline at 4000 BP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".