MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140088810 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2006.277567

Sample Rate Conversion Technology in Software Defined Radio

2006· article· en· W2140088810 on OpenAlexaff
Tianqi Wang, Cheng Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecimationCascaded integrator–comb filterSoftware-defined radioFilter (signal processing)Anti-aliasing filterComputer scienceSample (material)Nyquist rateElectronic engineeringDigital filterRoot-raised-cosine filterSampling (signal processing)TelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a reconfigurable integer factor sample rate converter is proposed for software defined radio (SDR) receivers. A general principle for digital filter design in sample rate conversion (SRC) in SDR receivers can be summarized as that implementation efficiency is emphasized in the front stages, while high performance must be emphasized in the back stages. Based on this principle, a cascaded integrate comb (CIC) filter with factor-16 down sampler is used to realize large-factor and multiplier-free decimation in the front stage, while a multistage decimator is implemented together with the CIC filter to provide finer integral down sample rate. The multistage decimator is consisted of three stages, with each stage serving as a factor-2 down sampler. The Nyquist filters are used as anti-aliasing filter in the first two stages, and the linear phase equiripple filter is used in the last stage. In the end, the results of the sample rate conversion in SDR receiver are provided in this paper

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207