MétaCan
← all works

Debating Phenomenological Research Methods

2009· article· en· 737 citations· W2140103930 on OpenAlex· 10.29173/pandpr19818

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian venueIt was published in a Canadian venue.

No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Abstract

Phenomenological researchers generally agree that our central concern is to return to embodied, experiential meanings aiming for a fresh, complex, rich description of a phenomenon as it is concretely lived. Yet debates abound when it comes to deciding how best to carry out this phenomenological research in practice. Confusion about how to conduct appropriate phenomenological research makes our field difficult for novices to access. Six particular questions are contested: (1) How tightly or loosely should we define what counts as "phenomenology" (2) Should we always aim to produce a general (normative) description of the phenomenon, or is idiographic analysis a legitimate aim? (3) To what extent should interpretation be involved in our descriptions? (4) Should we set aside or bring to the foreground researcher subjectivity? (5) Should phenomenology be more science than art? (6) Is phenomenology a modernist or postmodernist project, or neither? In this paper, I examine each of these areas of contention in the spirit of fostering dialogue, and promoting openness and clarity in phenomenological inquiry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

The record

Venue
Phenomenology & Practice
Topic
Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Field
Arts and Humanities
Canadian institutions
Funders
Keywords
Phenomenology (philosophy)PhenomenonEpistemologyInterpretative phenomenological analysisNomothetic and idiographicNormativeCLARITYSubjectivityLived experienceConfusionOpenness to experiencePresuppositionExperiential learningInterpretation (philosophy)SociologyEmbodied cognitionPsychologyQualitative researchSocial psychologyPhilosophySocial sciencePsychoanalysisPedagogy
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes