MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140107870 · doi:10.1109/icc.2006.255524

Turbo Equalization for Alamouti Space-Time Block Coded Transmission

2006· article· en· W2140107870 on OpenAlexaff
K. B. Wavegedara, Vijay K. Bhargava

Bibliographic record

Venue2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpace–time block codeComputer scienceBlock codeFadingMIMOAlgorithmDecoding methodsTurboTurbo codeEqualization (audio)Coding gainConvolutional codeBit error rateChannel (broadcasting)Electronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, space-time block coding (STBC) has received a remarkable interest as an effective transmit diversity technique to combat channel fading, but STBC provides little or no coding gain. However, as channel coding is usually employed in wireless systems, the combination of channel coding and STBC can be used to achieve high throughput gains over wireless channels. On the other hand, turbo (iterative) equalization can be employed in channel coded broadband wireless systems to further enhance the performance. Hence, in this paper, we propose a minimum mean square error (MMSE)-based turbo equalization scheme for Alamouti space-time (ST) block coded multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems. In the proposed iterative receiver, widely linear (WL) processing is used to exploit the rotational variance of the ST block coded transmit signal. Equalization and ST block decoding are jointly carried out at each iteration using the a priori information delivered by the convolutional channel decoder from the previous iteration. The extrinsic information generated by the combined soft equalization-ST block decoding stage is passed to the channel decoder as the a priori information. The simulation results demonstrate that high performance improvement can be obtained using the proposed iterative scheme in comparison with thenon-iterative equalization. Due to the low-complexity, the proposed iterative scheme may be highly attractive to be implemented in future Alamouti ST block coded wireless systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2006 IEEE International Conference on CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207