MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

FEMINISMO E RADICALIZAÇÃO DA DEMOCRACIA:

2015· article· pt· W2140173005 on OpenAlexaff
Mirla Cisne, María Lúcia Duriguetto

Bibliographic record

VenueSER Social · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Political Issues
Canadian institutionsBibliographical Society of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesDemocracyPolitical sciencePoliticsPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo apresenta premissas de análise da democracia para além dos parâmetros formal-institucionais que a compatibilizam com as determinações socioeconômicas do capitalismo. O foco é identificar democracia como um processo de democratização associado à construção de uma nova ordem societária que se contraponha à do capital. É com esse entendimento que traremos os conteúdos das lutas e das resistências feministas, como constitutivas deste processo de democratização na realidade brasileira contemporânea, permeada por um contexto de recrudescimento do conservadorismo, por meio de múltiplas violências e violações de direitos. Para tanto, realizamos uma pesquisa bibliográfica e documental.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.009
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.195
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSER SocialSame topicSocial and Political IssuesFrench-language works237,207