MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140219590 · doi:10.1088/0960-1317/13/4/324

Microfabricated electrolysis pump system for isolating rare cells in blood

2003· article· en· W2140219590 on OpenAlexafffund
Vasile I. Furdui, James K. Kariuki, D. Jed Harrison

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Micromechanics and Microengineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsElectrolysisMicrofluidicsMaterials scienceBuffer (optical fiber)Analytical Chemistry (journal)ElectrodeElectrolyteChromatographyChemistryOptoelectronicsBiomedical engineeringNanotechnologyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An integrated system for immunomagnetic separation of rare cells from blood is presented. A micromachined device was fabricated by bonding silicon die with etched structures to a glass cover plate on which electrodes are defined. Electrolytic generation of gas from 0.50 M KNO3 (aqueous) provided pumping actuation for a device that performed the capture and purification of rare cells spiked into a 7.5 ul reconstituted blood sample. The system consisted of two pumps, a sample and a wash buffer meander reservoir, and a main channel for magnetic field trapping of rare cells captured by antibody-coated magnetic beads. A maximum pumping rate of 1.4 +- 0.1 ul min[?]1 was obtained at a current of 180 uA, and the maximum blood sample volume delivered to the capture bed was 6.5-7 ul. The trapped cells could be washed with the buffer from the second pump and then delivered to the exit port of the chip after removing the magnetic field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Micromechanics and MicroengineeringSame topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207