MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140248144 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2006.880236

Space Vector Modulation Control of an AC–DC–AC Converter With a Front-End Diode Rectifier and Reduced DC-link Capacitor

2006· article· en· W2140248144 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaolei Chen, Mehrdad Kazerani

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRectifier (neural networks)Flyback converterForward converterSpace vector modulationCapacitorReservoir capacitorElectrolytic capacitorBoost converterĆuk converterModulation indexPeak inverse voltageVoltagePulse-width modulationElectrical engineeringPower factorElectronic engineeringComputer scienceDecoupling capacitorEngineeringVoltage optimisation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the control of an ac-dc-ac converter with a front-end diode rectifier and reduced dc-link capacitor based on the space vector modulation strategy is investigated. The modulation index is time-varying and determined by the instantaneous value of the dc voltage measured by a voltage sensor. Using a small bipolar capacitor, instead of a large electrolytic capacitor on the dc-link, increases the lifetime of the converter and reduces its size. The input current quality of this converter has been shown to be superior to that of the conventional ac-dc-ac converter with front-end diode rectifier. The perfectly sinusoidal local average output voltage can still be achieved under unbalanced input voltage condition by implementing a time-varying modulation index. The rule for determining the dc capacitance has also been studied in this paper. The simulation results obtained from PSIM simulation software and experimental results obtained from the lab prototype are used to verify the theoretical expectations

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207