Quand H2O et esprit de l’eau se rencontrent
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article a pour objectif principal de rendre visible la coexistence d’au moins deux mondes dans la Réserve autochtone de Puracé (Resguardo Indígena de Puracé, RIP) en s’appuyant sur les informations récoltées par l’auteur dans le cadre de visites des réseaux d’approvisionnement en eau du territoire en compagnie du Conseil autochtone de Puracé (Cabildo Indígena de Puracé, CIP). Ces mondes peuvent être définis en fonction de la façon dont ils interagissent avec l’eau : d’une part, le monde moderne, où l’eau est seulement un objet (H2O), et, d’autre part, le mondepas[si] modernepuracéen, où l’eau, en plus d’être un objet, présente des caractéristiques propres au sujet, comme l’esprit et la volonté. Attirer l’attention sur la coexistence de ces mondes peut par ailleurs influencer la mise en oeuvre des interventions contemporaines du développement et des politiques publiques dans les nations considérées comme multiculturelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".