MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140300928 · doi:10.1142/s0217732306018901

ON THE THERMO-INVARIANT COHERENT STATE IN THERMO FIELD DYNAMICS

2006· article· en· W2140300928 on OpenAlex
Xuefen Xu, Hong-Yi Fan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Physics Letters A · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsPhysicsCoherent statesThermal stateThermalState (computer science)Invariant (physics)Thermal reservoirField (mathematics)Statistical physicsQuantumQuantum mechanicsTheoretical physicsClassical mechanicsThermodynamicsPure mathematicsHeat transfer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By analyzing the characters of thermo field dynamics, which is proposed by Takahashi and Umezawa, we find that a new physical state, named the thermo-invariant coherent state, should exist in thermal equilibrium. This state not only maintains the whole energy of the system and the reservoir but is also a coherent state. We find its explicit form, its relation to the thermal coherent state and the thermal entangled state. When the whole system is in this state, annihilating a quantum of the system and in the meanwhile annihilating a hole with negative energy in the reservoir will not change the whole energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it