MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140302921 · doi:10.1109/vtcf.2006.365

Source-Channel Communication in One-Helper Problem

2006· article· en· W2140302921 on OpenAlexaff
Hamid Behroozi, M. Reza Soleymani

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Vehicular Technology Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFusion centerComputer scienceChannel codeChannel (broadcasting)Coding (social sciences)Distributed source codingScheduling (production processes)Computer networkPower consumptionSource codeLinear network codingPower (physics)Decoding methodsAlgorithmMathematical optimizationTelecommunicationsWirelessMathematicsCognitive radio

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the m-helper problem for the special case of m = 1 where one source provides partial side information to the fusion center (FC) to help reconstruction of the main source signal. Both sources communicate information about their observations to the FC through an orthogonal multiple access channel (MAC) without cooperating with each other. We characterize the optimal tradeoff between the transmission cost, i.e., power, and the distortion D using Shannon's separation source and channel coding theorem. We show that the separation approach outperforms the analog forwarding approach in the 1- helper problem. We also determine the optimal power scheduling to minimize the total power consumption in the network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Vehicular Technology ConferenceSame topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207