MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140317775 · doi:10.7202/007446ar

Le médicament aux frontières des savoirs humanitaires et autochtones

2004· article· fr· W2140317775 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Julie Laplante

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’article pose un regard sur le médicament aux frontières des savoirs humanitaires et autochtones alors que se créent des liens et des discontinuités entre le local et le global. Tiré d’une ethnographie multi-sites réalisée au sein d’un projet de Médecins Sans Frontières auprès de populations autochtones de l’Amazonie brésilienne, nous démontrons comment les formes de savoirs observées dans des villages autochtones du Médio Solimões peuvent s’articuler, ou non, au contexte plus large de la médecine humanitaire. Le médicament pharmaceutique et les plantes médicinales constituent les objets iconiques respectifs du savoir biomédical et des savoirs thérapeutiques autochtones permettant une lecture des relations de savoir-pouvoir qui entourent leur rencontre pendant qu’ils circulent sur une trajectoire humanitaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.414
GPT teacher head0.607
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologie et SociétésSame topicPharmaceutical Quality and CounterfeitingFrench-language works237,207