Movement behaviour of the Little Chief Slide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Little Chief Slide has been extremely slow moving at a rate of 4–14 mm/year since the late 1960s. The 800 million m3slide lies about 3 km upstream of Mica Dam in British Columbia. The extremely slow rate was not affected by the Mica Dam reservoir filling in the 1970s. Although the Little Chief Slide is classified as a rock slide, the extremely slow movements take place on seams of soft materials composed mainly of micaceous clay gouge. The characteristics of the movement trends with time were investigated at six zones using in-place inclinometers (IPIs). The trends of the movement with the reservoir level fluctuations and pore pressure changes were investigated to quantify the contribution of steady-state creep to the total in situ movements. The creep behaviour of the clay gouge materials forming the movement zones was also investigated in the laboratory. The laboratory and field creep behaviours were then compared. The movement could be partitioned into steady-state creep and seasonally induced creep movements. This partitioning identified the locations where the seasonal movements are the highest, and, hence, where drainage measures could have the biggest impact.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".