MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140366353 · doi:10.4141/cjps-2014-350

LT<sub>25</sub>, LT<sub>50</sub>, and LT<sub>75</sub> floral bud cold hardiness determinations for a diverse selection of <i>Vaccinium</i> genotypes

2014· article· en· W2140366353 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mark K. Ehlenfeldt, Lisa J. Rowland, Elizabeth L. Ogden, Bryan T. Vinyard

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBerry genetics and cultivation research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHardiness (plants)VacciniumSelection (genetic algorithm)BiologyHorticultureGenotypeClonal selectionBotanyCultivarGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ehlenfeldt, M. K., Rowland, L. J., Ogden, E. L. and Vinyard, B. T. 2015. LT25, LT50, and LT75 floral bud cold hardiness determinations for a diverse selection of Vaccinium genotypes. Can. J. Plant Sci. 95: 491–494. Freeze-bath cold hardiness results were used to calculate LT25 and LT75 values (temperatures causing 25% and 75% lethality, respectively) for a diverse selection of Vaccinium genotypes which had been previously analyzed for LT50 values. Overall, LT25 and LT75 values paralleled the LT50 values. Across genotypes, the LT25 was approximately 1.7°C (3.1°F) higher than the LT50, and the LT75 approximately 1.6°C (2.9°F) lower than the LT50 for any given date.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicBerry genetics and cultivation researchFrench-language works237,207