MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140379612 · doi:10.1086/466528

Toward the Development of an Antidisease, Transmission‐Blocking Intranasal Vaccine for Group A Streptococcus

2005· article· en· W2140379612 on OpenAlexaff
Michael R. Batzloff, Huaru Yan, Mark R. Davies, Jon Hartas, George H. Lowell, G.E. White, David S. Burt, Tomas Leanderson, Michael F. Good

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStreptococcal Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsGDI Integrated Facility Services (Canada)
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilActive Biotech
KeywordsMedicineNasal administrationStreptococcusAdjuvantStreptococcus pyogenesImmunologyGroup AImmunizationRespiratory tractAntibodyRespiratory tract infectionsMicrobiologyVirologyRespiratory systemBiologyBacteriaInternal medicineStaphylococcus aureus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infection with group A streptococcus (GAS) may result in a number of clinical conditions, including the potentially life-threatening postinfectious sequelae of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. As part of the search for a vaccine to prevent GAS infection, a conformationally constrained and minimally conserved peptide, J14, from the M protein of GAS has been defined. In the present study, J14 was formulated with bacterial outer membrane proteins (proteosomes) and then intranasally administered to outbred mice without additional adjuvant. Such immunization led to high titers of J14-specific serum immunoglobulin (Ig) G and mucosal IgA. After upper respiratory tract GAS challenge, immunized mice demonstrated increased survival and reduced GAS colonization of the throat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicStreptococcal Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207