MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140390673 · doi:10.12968/bjom.2012.20.4.279

Underpinning safety: Communication habits and situation awareness

2012· article· en· W2140390673 on OpenAlex
Stephen Abbott, Mary A.M. Rogers, Deela Freeth

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Midwifery · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPatient Safety and Medication Errors
Canadian institutionsAbbott (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnderpinningObservational studySafety culturePatient safetyPsychologyQuality (philosophy)Unit (ring theory)Applied psychologyWork (physics)Health careNursingMedicineEngineeringPolitical scienceManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Health care services that show evidence of a safety culture demonstrate effective communication and good situation awareness. This article reports observational research looking at these characteristics in two delivery units, undertaken as part of a study of safety culture. Contrasting team styles evident in daily routines (calm and cohesive in one, more fragmented in the other) were associated with contrasting levels of team situation awareness, which affected the handling of unexpected or urgent events. However, the association between safety and quality in the unit was less simple, suggesting that different styles of team work may be suited to routine and urgent care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it