MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2140411447 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2009.05.618

IC‐P‐064: Changes of brain network connectivity in early Alzheimer's disease: Preliminary findings applying a data‐driven approach

2009· article· en· W2140411447 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaowei Song, Andrew R. McIntyre, Ryan C.N. D’Arcy, Kenneth Rockwood

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoxelCluster analysisPattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceResting state fMRIArtificial intelligenceNeurosciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resting-state fMRI signal fluctuations have been used to study the default brain network connectivity. Such studies on AD have often applied user-biased reference functions and/or regions of interest, while emerging data-driven methods have shown promise, or even superior, performance for automatically mapping synchronous brain activations. Here, we apply an efficient self-organizing-map-clustering method to identify AD-associated changes in regional activation and global functional connectivity. Patients with mild AD (n = 6, age = 84+/-5 years, 3MS = 74+/-7) and healthy older adults (n = 17, age = 76+/-6 years, 3MS = 97+/-5) were scanned consecutively for 60 seconds during rest using a 4-Tesla Varian-Oxford human imaging system. Data were acquired using a two-shot spiral readout sequence (TR/TE = 1000/15ms, flip angle = 60°; FOV = 240×240×121 mm; matrix = 64 × 64; 22 axial slices, 5.0 mm + 0.5mmgap). Data were pre-processed and filtered for noise and low (>0.1 Hz) and high (<0.01 Hz) frequency and oscillating trends. A self-organizing-map algorithm was employed to identify characteristic temporal patterns. In an iterative correlation process, voxels were arranged in a two-dimensional lattice according to the similarity of their temporal patterns. The k-means clustering algorithm was used to partition the trained map into hard clusters. Data from each scan was examined independently three times and individual means were calculated. A similar number of clusters were observed for the AD and control groups (7.5+/-1.5 vs. 6.5+/-1.2, p > 0.05). The cluster members involved voxels located closely and those located remotely, representing the somato-motor, visio-spatial, and memory networks. However, the spatial representation of temporal patterns in AD was comparatively sparse in AD, and few voxels (p < 0.05) with greater variations in time-course were found within a cluster. In contrast, the intensity of signal fluctuations in certain cortical regions including the prefrontal lobes was greater in AD (p < 0.05). The altered spontaneous fMRI fluctuations in early AD suggest increased functional activation in certain cortical regions and decreased global functional synchronization connecting many such regions. Nevertheless, heterogeneity in spontaneous neural activity presents in both AD patients and healthy older adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→